Using the information from the New
York Post article, You will be judged, on how reality TV shows have given us a guideline on how
to dress more apprpriately so we can be perceived as acceptable. I will be
answering the question, is there a way to dress appropriately, everyday? Is
there a such thing as appropriate?
There are many TV shows that almost
serve as guidelines to what we should be westing and how we should be dressing
right. TLC’s TV show, What Not to Wear, allows twop people to walk into
somebody’s life and dictate what is right and wrong. I find this show
entertaining, and watch it, occasionally, in my fashion merchandising class.
The two leaders, Clinton Kelly, and Stacy London, do apply, what I like to call
them, “patients,” with fashion knowledge. They go through someones entite
wardrobe and rip it apart, throwing vast majority and most likely all of the
clothing away. They then provide their clients with $5,000 gift cards to spend
their money on more tasteful clothes, after being advised on what to wear.
Sometimes when I watch this shows,
I view them as being too harsh, but after seeing what some of the people are
actually wearing on an everyday basis, I see what they are constantly being
yelled at, and referred to the show in the first place. While going through
each person wardrobe thoroughly, “the hosts show each womean alternative
clothing that would look better on her. And in doing so, here’s where the
lessons start, they emohasize over and over the importance of dressing
approriately: appropriately for your age, for the occasion and for the
impression you are trying to make on others” (Riley).
While we mainly see the views of
the Stacy and Clinton, the producers clearly take a case on what the show
really is. Some may watch the shows and just think that the main point is to
humiliate people. The executive producer, Steohanie Eno claims “ ‘What Not To
Wear” is more than clothes. “ ‘The clothes represent who you are and how you
feel. They should help you bring out the best in yourself.’” The article then notes
that we are al raised with intention of not judging one another by how we look,
but the truth is we do, conciously or unconsciously.
There was a study in the article
mentioned. The study was done by Howard University medical students. One
picture of them, they were dressed in hoodies and the other labcoats, they then
asked the question, “do we looke suspicious?” They were putting the claim that
you might lump them in with being s suspicious person just because they choose
to walk around in a hoodies instead of a lab coat. Applying the show point of
view, they are syaing how they should be dressing apprpriately, so if a H oward
student is put in the position to work, he or she is not going to be wearinga
hoodie, but professionaly attire so they are not perceived as anything less.
The article then claims that Stacy
and Clinton are trying to explain reality to their clients, meaning that “women
who wear sweat pants every day look like they have given up. People who do not
know them may treat them with less respect as a result. Middle-aged women who
dress like they are in high school will not be taken seriously” (Riley).
Next question to research: Can we
manipulate/tailor a market to perceive what is stylish/instyle? Do markets do this automatically?
I want to take a look at the slightly more economic factors in my next post for the Passion Project.

No comments:
Post a Comment