Tuesday, April 28, 2015

Final Conclusion

This may help you out!

SOURCE: http://static1.squarespace.com/

I put all of my findings into one, here’s a list that puts the top factors together into picking a career. These aren’t in a specific order, they are put together to help lead someone in the right path.


  1. SALARY: It seems like money means a lot these days. Money drives the economy, gives power to the individual, leads to success, and can help put you in a better situation than what you’re in now. Money solves problems, which is why a lot of people want more and more. When picking a career, deciding how much money you’ll make each year might be a huge deciding factor. As we grow older, we want enough money so that we can support a family and eventually retire. As stated in a past blog post, the top careers make a lot of money, but make sure to consider your strengths and interests. Picking a career based only on how much money you’ll make isn’t the best idea. You want to do something you’re good at and if that also comes with a high salary, then you get the best of both worlds.
  2. The Trend of Top Careers: Careers tend to follow the trend of other fields. Technology is HUGE right now, and it’s affecting what jobs are popular and what jobs are necessary. As seen in a past post, the top careers nowadays are based off technology. It’s ever changing but the job market is following what’s popular. Picking a career in technology would be the best bet because it’ll always be around and will need people to follow it and be comfortable with it. Our generation is set in the technology department because we were born in a digital age.
  3. Parents Influence: Our parents while we were growing up made most of our decisions for us. They know our strengths, weaknesses, and what we would succeed at. I know being a young adult we want to make our own decisions, but considering what our parents have to say would be smart. It seems like a trend is to follow what you’re parents do, which is completely fine because you’ve probably been raised in that atmosphere. Otherwise, picking your own path is awesome, but considering what your parents have to say because they do have a lot of experience, may be beneficial.

This end conclusion is here to put the top factors together so a peer can pick a good path for themselves. I think there's more that goes into picking a solid career including likes/dislikes, strengths/weaknesses, and pros/cons of each career. 

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Stress on Student-Athletes vs Other Students

SOURCE: http://www.collegesportsscholarships.com/ 

The Stress of Student Athletes vs other students


What is the top concern for college athletes?  It’s time-management.  This is an important fact for high school student-athletes and their parents to understand.  It’s never too early to help your kids learn good study habits and time-management skills.The freshman year of college can be the biggest time of adjustment for the freshman student-athlete.  As the infographic illustrates much of this added pressure comes from the increased academic load.  And again there is a time-management component here as well. It is curious that finances concern less than ten percent of the college athlete population.  This is particularly interesting in light of the fact that increased scholarship compensation for college athletes has been a major news story in recent months.
One of the most effective ways for college athletes to deal with this stress is by simply dealing with and completing tasks one at a time.  Seven out of ten college athletes use this tool to relieve the stress.Why is completing tasks one by one so powerful?  For one thing–unlike other coping mechanisms–it deals directly with the issues and doesn’t take time away from them.  For instance, talking about stress problems and participating in recreational exercise can work well, but they also take time and can add to time-management issues.Finally, this infographic can be used as a resource and talking point for nt-athletes to anticipate and head off any problems that may lead to stress in college.parents and their student-athletes to anticipate and head off any problems that may lead to stress in college.
In my personal experiances, I have been more stressed and less motivated than when im not in season. I believe that these students who are in sports should recieve benefits. In my next and final blog post I will be discussing what benefits these students should recieve and my point of view of the subject.
Image: <a href="http://www.collegesportsscholarships.com"><img src="http://www.collegesportsscholarships.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Stress_College_Athlete.jpg" alt="sports scholarship" /></a>

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Schools Crack down on Dress Code

        
http://www.duvalschools.org/cms/lib07/FL01903657/Centricity/Domain/986/4873994_orig.jpg
    Pushing the limits is a constant thing that the young generation does, especially when it comes to what they wear. Today teens feel the need to express themselves socially and through what they wear. I believe that they should be able to, but some districts see some dress as being widely inappropriate and mildly distracting. This article from ProQuest and the Los Angeles Times by Bernice Hirabayashi,  explores the restrictions that the Proviso School district near us believe that they need to adopt, and what is viewed as clothing that is provocative an inappropriate.

            This article basically explores, the Westside of Chicago, district Lincoln wants to install a new dress code that wants to “forbid clothing that ‘disrupts the learning environment’” (Hirabayashi). They see that some view some clothing as provocative and controversial. Gangs are a major issue in the city and the neighboring suburbs, and the school district believes that “with the rise of gangs, certain fashions can be dangerous” (Hirabayashi). While I understand the perspective that the school districts are coming from, I believe that students should be able to express themselves, I believe that students ahead of time know their own limits and boundaries with the clothing they wear. I believe some districts have begun to judge their students to quickly with the fact that they do not know how to properly dress themselves.

            This brings to issue the other argument that the article brings up, that “the challenge is to let the kids be individuals but create a safe environment” (Hirabayashi). I believe that the students need to be able to wear what they desire. Installing a dress code will also cause students to rebel, which is what most schools try to avoid, a safe environment would be without rebellious kids, even though you will always have them. In every school there are rules and regulations, and sometimes dress codes are the only way we can truly express ourselves.

            The article shows the realization that “what may be dangerous one week may be nearly trendy the next” (Hirabayashi). Styles change all the time, and peoples clothing change depending on what on the market attracts their attention. Most schools have established small restrictions in their dress codes. For example, Hinsdale Central has guidelines on what students could wear, they do not crack down on it right away, but they make the effort to. Having guidelines I understand, but one particular item of clothing should not be banned from a school.

            The main problem that this article approaches is the safety that students are under, and clothing that could represent a gang or something towards violence is the main concern. Schools are worried of the impression they will make on other districts because of what their students wear. But, if a gangster-like fashion is in style, then students will gravitate towards it, especially if they see someone of great influence wear clothing like that.

            I found this article interesting because it explored the viewpoints of administrators, parents, and students. You get multiple perspectives when reading this article, which makes it very beneficial to see the different sides that people take when it comes to what we wear on a daily basis.

1. How can schools positively go about restricting clothing without limiting the students to much?
2. Do uniforms make students more rebellious?

            

If The Players Are Risking Their Lives, Then Why Are They Doing All The Work

In this HBO segment, HBO goes to multiple universities and talk to former athletes which have been injured because of their sport and play at the university. One former student that they talk with is a former football player for Penn State and had a life injury in which he cannot play football or any other sport for the rest of his life. The player also has to go to the University every week/month to be treated in which a treatment that he is paying for. Another player that they interview is a player for Illinois State University. In this story this player also was injured because of football and now can not even walk properly (needs a cane) and has trouble even just standing up. just like in the previous story this player is paying around $10,000 a year just for his treatment which the funds are coming from his pockets.
Link
In my opinion I find both of these stories outrageous. For a player to be playing and risking his life and yet when they get injured the university won’t pay for their injuries. Also at most universities, when athletes get injured, the athletes are dropped from the university meaning that they will lose their scholarship because in the interest to the university they have no purpose now that they can’t play that sport anymore. The thing that really bothered me the most was the story about the Illinois State player who had a life changing injury and yet the university had done nothing really at all to help. One college analyst in the video also says that technically everyone in the stadium is covered if they were to be injured. So I guess the question is: Shouldn't the athletes be covered medically if they were to have an injury while playing a sport for that college.

FUTURE RESEARCH: What is my final conclusion on should college athletes be paid?

Free Music

How is hip hop changing the way we listen to music?

SOURCE: WWW.COMPLEX.COM

In the past few weeks, hip hop mogul Jay Z released a music streaming app called Tidal. The app proclaimed to have high quality music streaming and exclusive content, as Jay Z partnered with industry heavy hitters like Beyonce, Rihanna, Kanye West, and more. After the initial hype pushed the app to only moderate, temporary success, it later fell to below the top 750 spot in the iTunes app store.

While the app is still in its beginning phases and still has room to improve and grow, it speaks to the power of the artists in the industry. If even the most popular, successful artists cannot get people to pay for the service, there will be little to nothing that will. The success of the app mirrors public opinion, as people have now gotten used to finding ways to download music for free, whether legal or not.

The music industry has changed, as consumers demand instant gratification when it comes to listening to music. People have creatively found services and websites to stream music for free the second it comes out, or even before it comes out. The hip hop industry has contributed to this mindset, as rappers release mixtapes and albums that are available instantly, for free, on multiple websites or apps.

It will be interesting to see where the future of the music industry goes. If people stop paying for music altogether, how will it affect the commercial success of hip hop artists? While tours, appearances, and merchandise can still make an artist wealthy, album sales currently contribute to a great portion of artists' success.

Future Question: How does the Illuminati affect the hip hop indudstry?

Civil Lawsuit to be Filed Against City of Ferguson- Michael Brown

SUMMARY: The parents of Michael Brown, the 18 year old shot to death in Ferguson, are planning to file a civil lawsuit against the city of Ferguson because they did not get justice over their son’s death. St. Louis grand jury declined to prosecute Darren Wilson, the shooter, but the federal justice department spoke out against them. After this review, many city officials resigned.


ANALYSIS: While nothing can change the fact that Michael died, it is good that his death is changing things. It makes me think, it would be a lot cheaper for us to be less racist. I know the Ferguson police department spends a lot of money arresting and searching and dealing with lawsuits based on their treatment of black people. It would save everyone a lot of time and money to just accept everyone. It seems like the most economically sound decision.


DISCUSSION QUESTIONS: Why is it so hard to keep officers in check? Why is it so hard to change opinions? And how can we do all of this more efficiently?


LINK TO ARTICLE: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/chi-civil-lawsuit-michael-brown-ferguson-20150422-story.html

What's Out There?

Planets and galaxies wallpaper
http://www.superbwallpapers.com/
They’ve been a topic of heated debate, but I take the side that says they exist. What exactly? Aliens, not illegal aliens, but the commonly known as little green men. It might not be creatures how they are usually described, but something all together. An article, all about space, says that life in space will be discovered by 2025. The article uses many quotes from NASA scientists. The question I will be answering is: What proof do we have life could exist elsewhere, and what benefits will it have to us? My answer is that there are many reasons on how life could exist in space, with other galaxies similar to ours, and the benefits it holds to us is that we could find another habitable place, as well as possibly other resources.


To begin with, how could life exist out there? We all know that space is a void, no air to breathe, immense pressure that would kill us, if not for our astronaut suits. But with all the planets and galaxies, there is a way. First, focusing on our own galaxy, the Milky Way, we see that obviously there is life. Life forms exist, on Earth. But then there’s Mars. Our neighboring planet that once held water, could that possibly still have some type of life? Proof of oceans on Mars is that it has markings on its surface. “Oceans covered much of Mars in the ancient past, and seasonal dark streaks observed on the Red Planet's surface today may be caused by salty flowing water.” As you can see, it not only says that oceans existed on Mars, but it gives proof as well. Back to the idea of life on Mars, according to NASA, yes, it may. “Further, NASA's Curiosity rover has found carbon-containing organic molecules and "fixed" nitrogen, basic ingredients necessary for Earth-like life, on the Martian surface.” It says that elements for life exist on Mars, which also exist on Earth. So life may have existed on Mars, but now there’s the issue whether there’s life out of our galaxy. It’s kind of hard to say “No, life can only exist on Earth and nowhere else in this infinite, seemingly continuously expanding universe, with millions and billions of galaxies just like the our Milky Way that contains trillions of planets like Earth.” I just can’t see someone making that argument. Moving on, there are two classifications of planets, terrestrial and gas giants. “Indeed, Kepler's work has shown that rocky worlds like Earth and Mars are probably more common throughout the galaxy than gas giants such as Saturn and Jupiter.” This means that the likelihood of more planets similar to Earth and Mars is far greater than planets such as Jupiter existing. The possibility of life existing elsewhere in our universe, even our galaxy is highly likely


Now that I’ve gotten past showing the likeliness of alien life, I’d like to address the benefits. The answer may seem like there’s absolutely none, and that it’s foolish to waste over billions of dollars for just exploring for more life. However, if there’s life-like environments in space, that means it’s habitable. In this dying Earth, we need to find a way out, or find a way to decrease our consumption of materials. But that’s besides the point, moving forward, once we can find a habitable place, we can also use it’s resources. “The main goal of this $2.1 billion mission will be to shed light on the icy moon's potential habitability, but it could also search for signs of alien life: Agency officials are considering ways to sample and study the plumes of water vapor that apparently erupt from Europa's south polar region.” Europa is one of the moons of Jupiter, and has a smooth icy surface. Underneath this surface is oceans of water. If we received water from Europa, after extensive testing and making sure it’s safe, we could soon solve water shortage problems. This would greatly benefit all of us, since Europa is the sixth largest moon, and the fifteenth largest object in the Solar System, meaning it has a massive abundance of water. Not only can we derive resources that would ultimately benefit us, but we can also find habitable places, as I referred to earlier. The major point of habitable planets other than Earth is that the Earth is overpopulated. Humans grow at an exponential rate, and the Earth struggles to stay with our sudden growth. Once we find a place that we can inhabit, we can move more and more people to those planets, slowly decreasing the population on Earth. This will benefit Earth itself, as well as people because they get a new abundance of resources, and they’ve been removed from the original social binding they were in. They have a new start, in a sense.

I think that it would be interesting, because space has so many benefits, It’s hard to count them all. If we find new life, we can study it, and hopefully it won’t be hostile, like nearly every alien movie ever. We could learn more about life, and other things. Not only could we find life, but begin life on new planets, which is an extremely interesting concept to me. We would inhabit other places, and use those resources, but it interests me that places like this could actually exist. The universe is known for apparently being endless, so basically anything can occur in this vast space. We don’t know what lies beyond in galaxies far, far away, and maybe someday we will find out. 

For my final blog post, I’ll compare both space and sea again, and see which is the better one, with all the information I have gathered. I will try to consider each from a set of similar criteria.

Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Food Waste Survey Results

Ever wonder what how much food students waste at Hinsdale Central?

I had a cooking class take a survey I made and here are the results.

  1. Do you throw away the leftover food you make in cooking class?
Yes:4/28 Sometimes: 19/28 No:5/28
  1. Do you ever throw away the extra food you didn’t eat from your lunch?
Yes: 7/28 Sometimes: 15/28 No: 6/28
  1. If yes or sometimes, could yo have easily packed up the food you threw away to take home or give to another person?
Yes: 8/22 Sometimes: 7/22 No: 7/22
  1. Did you know that about 3.5 million children die every year from hunger?
Yes: 15/28 No: 13/28
  1. Did you know that Americans waste about 40% of food produced for consumption?
Yes: 12/28 No: 16/28
  1. List the food with it’s amount that you threw away yesterday that could have been saved:
There were thing written down such as 2 meatballs, portillo’s cake, baked potato, and a ¼ bag of chips. The most food I saw wasted that was written down was half a sandwich… 15 people wrote “none”.
  1. When you are eating out at a restaurant, do you:
Throw away extra food: 2/28 Pack it up to take home: 26/28

One of the cooking teachers told me that the school gives the leftover ingredients to a food pantry at the end of the year.

I honestly thought that the numbers of food waste was going to be higher. It was realistic that more people know that kids die every year from going hungry but less people realized that American’s waste 40% of food produced. 8 people realize that there is a better place for their leftover food than the trash but still choice to throw their food away.

Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Grading of baseball cards



What makes one grading company different than another?
http://www.sportscollectorsdaily.com


Every collector wants to protect their baseball cards. The best way to ensure that your card will be safe, is to encapsulate your card. PSA does in my opinion the best job of grading, protecting and authenticating my baseball cards.


PSA or Professional Sports Authenticator has been around since the 1950's as they launched their company in the beginning of 1952. Although they did have a good idea about grading cards, but most importantly they entered the baseball card market at the perfect time. Big hitter, Mickey Mantle, started his first year in the major leagues in 1952.


There are other companies that now grade baseball cards such as SCG and BGS, but each company performs differently. Some succeed in one area while others fall short.


According to a writer from The Cardboard Connection named Brett Lewis informs baseball collectors of a common mistake that people make when picking the company to grade their cards. He believes that each company does a good job of grading cards from a certain time period.


PSA is what he calls as the “most popular” grading company due to the most collected baseball cards in the last decade. PSA specializes in grading cards from the 1950’s to the 1980’s. Although PSA can grade any baseball card, the majority of people pick them when dealing with cards from that time period.


SCG is a company that I have never used before but does have a good reputation. SCG or Sports Card Guaranty has been the prefered company with cards that are from the 1950’s and earlier. One reason why someone might choose SCG over another company is because SCG has an unique grading scale that ranges from 1 being poor to 100 being mint.


BGS is also a unique company established to provide graded cards that date from 1980’s and later. BSG or Beckett Grading Services is known for their graded signatures. As baseball cards have evolved, so has the content in every pack of baseball cards. Now it is normal to find a signed baseball card in a pack of baseball cards.


I hope that this has helped people who are thinking about grading any kind of baseball card. My knowledge on the other companies that also grade cards was close to clueless. Now knowing which companies specialize in each area, I can get the best grades for my cards.   

FUTURE RESEARCH: What are the indicators if a card is a fake? What actions can a collector take if they buy a fake card?

Friday, April 17, 2015

How Record Companies Make Money

SOURCE: musicclout.com

How important are record labels?
Behind every great artist, there's a music label backing everything they do and promoting all of their stuff. But how responsible is a label for an artist's success? This article from Taxi.com seems extremely credible because it is taken from a published book about the music industry by Diane Rapaport.

This article basically explains how record labels make profit from their artists. The music industry is very competitive as we know and is extremely difficult to get into so music labels must be wise with their spending towards an artist. The article reports that, "approximately 90% of the records that are released by major recording labels fail to make a profit," so when signing an artist, they must be confident that the artist will make a profit.

The costs that a record label are responsible for are recording costs, manufacturing costs, royalty costs, promotional costs, and distribution costs. These things are all necessary when they decide to sign an artist. First, recording costs are generated only by the artist for making their record. The label, however, a majority of the time gives loans to the artist to cover some of their costs because making a record is expensive and can cost tens even hundred's of thousands of dollars. Manufacturing costs are the costs generated from actually producing and making the physically copy of the record. This is generally between 50-65 cents per CD. 

Next are the royalty costs. These are the expenses paid to the artist and composers and publishers for making the music. The artist receives either a percentage of the suggested list retail price (SLRP) or based on the price sold to distributors. Finally, there are promotional and distribution costs. Promotional costs are generated for actually advertising the artist. Labels usually dedicate between 10-20 percent of their budget to marketing the record. And when the record is all done, the label gives the final product to a distribution company and marks a price on it. When all is said and done, did the label make a profit or not?

I thought this article was really interesting because it shows all the steps a record label takes when marketing a new artist. Labels are important to an artist. They boost the popularity and take care of a lot of the behind the scenes stuff that the artists don't usually take care of. But, as we saw in the last article I looked at, labels and companies like Pandora and Spotify that advertise their music make the majority of the money while the artist themselves does not. I think there should be more of an emphasis on the artists receiving more of the profit than labels and other companies that distribute the music.

1. What is the step by step process into making a record?
2. Are record labels as important as the artist themselves?

Influential Artists

Influential Artists

How and why have hip hop artists become so influential?


http://www.eonline.com/news/647082/the-most-kanye-esque-quotes-from-kanye-west-s-time-100-interview

Kanye West recently appeared on the cover of Time magazine's 100 Most Influential People issue. In a short article accompanied by a video, West detailed his influence and his mission to make the world a better place through "helping people." He stated that he does not care about having a personal legacy, because our lives are so insignificant in the grand scope of the universe, and went on to discuss details of his personal life and how he became involved in music.

The article draws attention to the fact that people worldwide are fascinated with Kanye West, along with other hip hop artists, to the point where they are becoming some of the world's most influential people by simply making music and participating in other art ventures. Why is it that people are so interested in hip hop artists and their lifestyles?

Perhaps it's because these artists live a life of luxury that the average person can only imagine. Artists rap about private jets, extravagant vacations, expensive drugs, expensive clothes, and getting bottle service in the club, among other things. In my opinion, rap stars lead some of the most interesting lives on the planet. They are able to wake up and do what they love everyday, creating music and working on projects that they're passionate about. They are constantly under pressure to be the best, and to create a new classic, so rap music is only improving over time (aside from the cheesy, artificial rappers that are in it only for the payout.) And obviously, they are extremely successful financially, so they get to enjoy everything that financial success provides.

I'm interested in continuing to see the influence of hip hop artists grow. For a relatively new genre that began less than fifty years ago, it's a big deal for a hip hop artist to grace the cover of Time's most significant issue of the year. How the influence will continue to grow to affect the economy and popular culture will be interesting to watch.

Future Question: How is hip hop changing the way we listen to music?

Opportunities for Survivors

https://www.rainn.org/slideshow/images/RAINN_keyboard.jpg
After the fairly devastating research I’ve done that had me convinced that rape and sexual assault is going to take over the world and there’s nothing we can do to stop it, I decided to look into what the survivors can do to help themselves after an attack. Their lives don’t have to stop, and most of them have to continue on like it never happened. But instead of focusing on the fallbacks of the system and the struggles of those victimized, I want to talk about the good things we’ve done, and the strength of survivors.


Survivors can get a rape kit without having to immediately decide if they will report it as a crime. It is hard to get treatment, it is hard to report it as a crime. But after a sexual assault, medical assistance is a really good idea. So it’s a really beautiful thing that survivors are allowed to get a rape kit done and then decide later. This allows them to take it one step at a time, and lessens the pressure. It also shows the respect the law and medical fields are starting to give to survivors.


Many states have no statute of limitation for rape, and for other sexual assault, some states give up to 20 years for the victim to come forward. While it isn’t perfect, it’s something. It allows the survivor to work through their own trauma before facing it again in court. By doing this, I’d imagine testimonies are better because memories are less blurred (especially after trauma therapy). Also, witnesses are less easily intimidated because they have had more time to get over it.


Organization’s like RAINN exist. These organizations give a public voice to survivors and victims. They give the public more conclusive data in an easy to access place, all together. They make victims feel that they are not alone. They offer support groups (though these support groups aren’t always the most helpful, it is a way to meet others in a similar situation). They offer links to helplines and counselors. They reach all around the globe as well. And the even better thing? They’re not the only ones.

It’s hard to find the positives in something like sexual assault. Nothing about the assault in itself is good. But we’re getting a little bit better with helping survivors through the aftermath. We have a long way to go, but I’m glad we’ve at least gotten this far.

I hope I get the opportunity to learn more through interviewing survivors on their opinion on how we handle things, and how well all of this gets carried out.

Family Politics


Jack Mcleod and Steven Chaffee, two political science scholars, 40 years ago found that communication was the most important factor to a successful family environment.  Later in life, they found this communication has influenced political attitudes and behaviors.  They found that “the patterns of communication your family utilized--whether they talked specifically about government or not -- can have an influence on how you identify with politics”.  We are socialized into our political environment by our peers, school, and media.  However, your families influence trumps all.

 When we are young, you start to understand political symbols like the american flag.  Then we start to understand different beliefs and different political parties. Most of the time siblings and children all have the same political affiliations as their parents even if they have different stances on issues. Studies have shown children with more educated parents and higher socioeconomic backgrounds tend to be more politically active.


I agree with this idea.  In my family, my parents, my siblings, and I have similar ideologies.  We are all democrats however, we have different stances on specific issues.  I also think that the community around you and your peers have a huge influence on you.  In Hinsdale, many of my peers have similar ideas.  I realized that the more families communicate with each other the more similar beliefs they will have.  


Is life different for children with only child syndrome?
Why are people competitive?

To Be, Or To Go With Your Gut Instinct.

You never know one-hundred percent what an outcome will be, but you only hope for the best.

Many people go with their gut: what college to go to, whether to go to that party your friend told you about at his house where his parents won't be home until the next morning. Or simply, a relationship.

All relationships are based on gut instincts, in my mind. You start liking someone on the gut instinct that they will be a great boyfriend/girlfriend, or that you may end up marrying them one day, or that they won't cheat on you. We date to marry, and not all relationships last forever, but how exactly do we find that someone we're supposed to be with for the rest of out lives, and even, possibly, procreate with? It's called going with your gut.


Psychology Today, a website focused on how the brain works, published an article called Gut Almighty, showing the affects of gut instinct in different situations, including relationships. Carlin Flora, author of the article and staff member of Psychology Today for over 8 years, makes the statement that gut instincts can be good, but many decisions require much more "math" than just what you think you know. 

One sub-topic of her article, "A Strong Hunch can be The Beginning of a Beautiful Relationship" relates this gut feeling to starting a relationship. Flora states it is better to go with a gut instinct for a relationship, and not put "numeric values" on their aspects and qualities. "We've all heard the stories of couples who 'just knew' the moment they met that something serious was going to develop between them," states Flora. So how can this be related to those in relationships with large age gaps.

Every one knows dating man/woman who is 20 years older/younger than you are is still a tough subject for people to wrap their heads around. You're in two different parts of your lives, one of you has a career, the other still lives with their parents, and you want to tell that person you love them and they mean the world to you and you can't imagine your life without them but you fear that if someone you know will not except it finds out, you're both done for. Go with your gut instinct, live in the moment, love that person, and do what you can to keep the relationship going, because someday you may find your self fighting to stay with someone older than you, and not just by a year or two. You're entitled to live your life, whether on instinct or not. Go with your gut, for once in your life, and live for the one who is 20 or 30 or 50 years older than you. For all you know, they might love you back.

New Ford Automatically Obeys Speed Limits

Ford claims to have to solution to the people with a lead foot, or the speed demons.  The newest edition of the S-Max car has new technology that will actually scan the traffic signs/speed limits and adjust the throttle to help drivers stay within legal speeds, and to avoid fines.

The S-Max is able to scan the roads with its traffic sign recognition and will adjust the speed accordingly.  The new system doesn't even pull down the brake to slow down, instead it smoothly controls engine torque by electronically adjusting the amount of fuel delivered to the engine.

This technology is taking a step towards to the driver-less car, but those still have yet to hit the markets.  

New Ford S-Max Technology

Technology is improving day by day in our society, and will continue to improve for a long time.  Life as we know it today, will be very different come 20 years.  Technology such as this that Ford has created will not only keep people from speeding, but it will also keep people safe. Ford says that drivers can temporarily override the system by pressing down on the throttle, but the car will respond and will go back to the given speed limit soon after.  This technology will defiantly help keep the roads a safer place, and will lead to further technology for cars to come.  



What is the newest invention on the market?
What sorts of products can we expect?
What are the most successful technology companies?

Safety and LGBT Students

How is attending school different for LGBT students?



LGBT unsafe.jpg
Summary:
In the annual National School Climate Survey, conducted by GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian, Striaght Education Network) it was found that in all cases students of the LGBT community are more likely to be physically and verbally harassed than any other population.


Important Passages:


“LGBT students who experienced higher levels of victimization because of their sexual orientation: - Were more than three times as likely to have missed school in the past month than those who experienced lower levels (61.1% vs. 17.3%); - Had lower grade point averages (GPAs) than students who were less often harassed (2.8 vs. 3.3); - Were twice as likely to report that they did not plan to pursue any post-secondary education (e.g., college or trade school) than those who experienced lower levels (8.7% vs. 4.2%); and - Had higher levels of depression and lower levels of self-esteem.”
  • Analysis
    • I think this set of percentages and facts reflects the effect of the harassment students face in their everyday lives. Upon initially reading the percent of missed school in kids harassed due to their sexual orientation is astounding. 61% is a completely ridiculous number of students who are so uncomfortable that they must miss school, as a society I think we should place a large value on each individual's well-being. Besides have social workers and guidance counselors, I think health classes should be required to cover also the health of LGBT teens in depth. Like the idea of evolution not being taught in biology classes, it's important that the history and movement of LGBT people is taught not only to educate and prevent ignorance, but also to protect those kids that are just a little different than everyone else.


“More than half of LGBT students (55.5%) reported feeling unsafe at school because of their sexual orientation.” and “Nearly three quarters of students reported being verbally harassed at school because of their sexual orientation; more than half were verbally harassed because of their gender expression.”
  • Analysis
    • I think that this idea is difficult to see at Hinsdale Central, but in other places (more urban places) it is a lot more prominent. In a place, like Hinsdale where deviant, or non-conforming behavior is not accepted many LGBT students are forced to maintain a constant veil of their actual identity. Students outside the bubble of Hinsdale are facing constant negative harassment, verbally at least. Here, students are harassed but it is extremely secretive and I think it's important to find a way to combat it.


  • Analysis
    • I think these statistics pose a very interesting question, how similar are that of homophobic and sexist remarks? According the survey in nearly every category they scored the same. Many feminists, myself included would argue that women often hear the same remarks and are treated unfairly. But, putting the fact that I'm a woman beside- do LGBT people really receive the same treatment? No. They are scrutinized at a much higher level.
Future Research:
  • I think it would be very interesting to explore the relationship between the LGBT movement and other movements today. Specifically the recent movements against police brutality and the women's movement.